Welcome to The Augustine Bioethics Network
An international community of volunteers seeking a deeper shared understanding of the dignity and vulnerability of every human person.
Resource libraryWho we are
We are an international network administered and overseen by a company limited by guarantee based in the United Kingdom. The network is supported by a committee of which Prof Neil Scolding is chair and Prof David Albert Jones is secretary, and by an advisory board which includes two theological advisors (Rev Dr John O’Connor OP and Sr Margaret Atkins). The network is endorsed and actively supported by the Catholic Medical Association UK who have an appointed representative on the advisory board (Dr Dominic Whitehouse) and a member on the Committee (Dr Mike Delany). Our patron is the great philosopher and theologian, Augustine of Hippo.
Read moreRecently added content
Euthanasia Case Studies from Belgium: Concerns About Legislation and Hope for Palliative Care
ABN Papers
June 23, 2026
Summary In examining the ethics of euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS), it is common to focus on presenting arguments which either support or oppose the legalisation of the practice. As EAS is now legal in many countries (and in some cases, has been for many years) however, there is emerging evidence of the effect of
Twenty questions on assisted dying and suicide prevention
ABN Papers
June 23, 2026
Twenty questions on assisted dying and suicide prevention David Albert Jones[i] [i] Professor of Bioethics, St Mary’s University, Twickenham and Research Fellow at Blackfriars Hall, Oxford University, but writing here in a personal capacity. This paper has not been through a formal peer review process, though it has benefited from comments from colleagues. It is
Salus Populi Suprema Lex: A Legal Critique of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
ABN Papers
June 22, 2026
Executive Summary The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (‘the Bill’) introduced by Kim Leadbeater MP which is currently being considered by the House of Commons possesses purported safeguards which have been previously proposed and subject to sceptical critique by the Divisional Court of the High Court and the Court of Appeal, as well